SKILLEMALL.ai

AC retail-target-tracking-analysis

门店目标追踪分析工具。支持日/周/月三周期目标追踪,T-N数据延迟,黄绿黄灯状态预警。 核心能力: 1. 三周期追踪(日追踪-晨会/实时预警、周追踪-周会复盘、月追踪-月度考核) 2. T-N数据延迟支持(默认T-1) 3. 黄绿黄灯状态(🟢正常、🟡关注、🟠警告、🔴告警/紧急) 4. 批量告警检查(检查所有门店,按优先级排序) 5. 定时任务预留接口 触发条件: - 用户询问目标达成(如"本月目标达成率") - 用户需要预警(如"哪些门店需要关注") - 用户追踪业绩(如"业绩进度如何")

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Xtechmerge.AI v1.0.0 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 349 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 5 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 349 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 253: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 13 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 5 items
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill appears useful for store BI analysis, but it can access broader business data than its stated store-level scope clearly discloses.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026