AB factoriago
FactoriaGo platform assistant — AI-driven academic paper revision and resubmission. Activate when user mentions: FactoriaGo, revise paper, reviewer comments, resubmit, LaTeX editing, paper revision, manuscript revision, journal resubmission, reviewer response, academic paper editing, revision letter, respond to reviewers, paper submission. Supports: (1) onboarding new users to factoriago.com, (2) calling FactoriaGo API to manage projects/tasks/files, (3) generating reviewer response letters, (4) analyzing reviewer feedback and creating revision strategies.
As a process B 67/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, progress reporting
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 67/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 51 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1396 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 562: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 51 items
- +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.