SKILLEMALL.ai

CB industry-deep-dive-pipeline

>

ClawHub Agent Skills author: haiyangchen v1.1.0 MIT-0 13 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 2 722 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 8 d ago

>

As a process B 71/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, consistency, progress reporting

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
70
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
71/100
Nearly there
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
30
Consistency w 8
40
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 13. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning frontmatter-yaml SKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Unexpected double-quoted-scalar at node end at line 24, column 17: version: "1.1.0"" agent_created: true read_when: - 产业深度文章 - 行业深度稿 - … ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value
    • warning description-short description under 40 chars: too little signal for triggering
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "not_for"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "description_zh"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "description_en"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "agent_created"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "read_when"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 71/100

    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (industry-deep-dive-pipeline) differs from the folder (industry-deep-dive-pipeline-skill)
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 120 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2722 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Description length 1: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Structure: 24 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 120 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
    • +3All 2 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 70.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill is a disclosed Chinese-first editorial research pipeline that writes and validates article case files, with no evidence of hidden execution, persistence, exfiltration, or destructive behavior.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 8 Oct 2026