CB invassistant
Multi-asset investment portfolio management framework with A/B/C asset-class differentiated rules, 7 red-line portfolio risk controls, and 4-factor QMS quality scoring. Covers US, A-share (China), and HK stocks with disciplined entry/exit logic. 中文摘要：多资产投资组合管理框架——A/B/C 类资产差异化规则、7 条红线组合风险控制、四因 子质量管理，覆盖美股/A股/港股的纪律化进出场逻辑。触发词：投资组合管理、持仓复盘、 风险红线检查、仓位规则.
Multi-asset investment portfolio management framework with A/B/C asset-class differentiated rules, 7 red-line portfolio risk controls, and 4-factor QMS…
As a process B 71/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 19. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- error
name-missingSKILL.md: frontmatter has no `name` - warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 7126 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "slug" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "displayName" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "description_zh" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "read_when" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "not_for" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "disable" - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 401): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 71/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 7126 tokens
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 38 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 15 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- -38 of 9 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 349: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 29 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 38 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 33.