SKILLEMALL.ai

AC ljh-maidian

卖点体检器。丢一句或一组卖点文案进来,跑六道检验,判断这是独一份卖点还是随时会被抄的公共卖点,给出通过/打回结论和改法。 触发方式:/ljh-maidian、「帮我看看这个卖点行不行」「这句卖点站得住吗」「体检一下我的卖点」「这个卖点会不会被主播怼回来」 Selling-point health check. Feed in one or a batch of selling-point copy, run six checks, and get a pass/reject verdict with concrete fixes. Trigger: /ljh-maidian, "check my selling point", "is this selling point solid", "will this get challenged by a live host" 论文摘要评审、产品说明书合规审查等非带货卖点语境,不要自动触发。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: HandsoMeng v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 387 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

卖点体检器。丢一句或一组卖点文案进来,跑六道检验,判断这是独一份卖点还是随时会被抄的公共卖点,给出通过/打回结论和改法。 触发方式:/ljh-maidian、「帮我看看这个卖点行不行」「这句卖点站得住吗」「体检一下我的卖点」「这个卖点会不会被主播怼回来」 Selling-point health check.

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

Proceduretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 51 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1387 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 423: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 18 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 51 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill’s main review function is clear, but it also creates local records, saves business deliverables, and promotes off-platform contacts.
    LLM: suspicious (medium) · 6 Aug 2026