SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AD github-repo-bootstrap

Publish, bootstrap, or tidy a GitHub repository so the README and full GitHub About metadata stay in sync. Use when an agent is asked to create a new repo, push an existing local project to GitHub, fill or fix the About section, set description/homepage/topics, or make the README and repository presentation match.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Song Seung Hu v0.1.1 MIT-0 4 files · 1 script body ≈ 674 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Publish, bootstrap, or tidy a GitHub repository so the README and full GitHub About metadata stay in sync.

As a process D 45/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureGitHubSoftware developmentWriting and documentsAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
91
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
45/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (github-repo-bootstrap) differs from the folder (lazygithub-bootstrap)
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 85Steps. 37 steps, 2 vague phrases
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 674 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 315: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 6 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 37 items
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill visibly helps publish or update GitHub repositories, but users should confirm visibility and content before letting it push or edit metadata.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 3 Jun 2026