AC pm-cognition-coach
产品认知跃迁教练。基于23年产品实战经验，帮助产品经理在AI时代完成认知升级与职业身份转型。适用于：(1) 焦虑AI替代/想做AI转型的产品经理，(2) 希望从功能执行升级为系统设计者，(3) 35+PM寻找第二曲线，(4) 公司引入AI后更乱需要诊断，(5) 想用认知跃迁方法论突破职业瓶颈。
产品认知跃迁教练。基于23年产品实战经验，帮助产品经理在AI时代完成认知升级与职业身份转型。适用于：(1) 焦虑AI替代/想做AI转型的产品经理，(2) 希望从功能执行升级为系统设计者，(3) 35+PM寻找第二曲线，(4) 公司引入AI后更乱需要诊断，(5) 想用认知跃迁方法论突破职业瓶颈。
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 48 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1061 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 147: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 14 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 48 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.