SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC android-armor-breaker

Android APK脱壳工具（android脱壳）与加固破解工具 - Frida-based dynamic unpacker for commercial protections (360, Baidu, Tencent, IJIAMI, Bangcle, AliProtect). Extract DEX from protected APKs, bypass anti-debug, support root memory extraction. 安卓加固脱壳、反调试绕过、DEX提取、内存dump、Frida脱壳、Android逆向、安全研究。android脱壳、脱壳工具、frida脱壳、APK脱壳、加固破解、反调试、内存提取、逆向工程。Supports Android脱壳, Frida脱壳, APK脱壳, 加固破解, 反调试 bypass, memory extraction, root memory dump, DEX extraction, commercial reinforcement analysis.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 小红星 v2.2.6 MIT-0 24 files · 1 script body ≈ 4 731 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
82/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
92
Quality 40%
67
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
52/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 8

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 8
  • low Obfuscation obf-hex-escape-chain scripts/root_memory_extractor_enhanced.py:53
    Escaped/char-code string obfuscation (detector / deny-list definition)
    "dex_encryption_signature": b'\x63\x6f\x6d\x2e\x74\x65\x6e\x63\x65\x6e\x74',  # "com.tencent"
    detector
  • low Obfuscation obf-hex-escape-chain scripts/root_memory_extractor_enhanced.py:71
    Escaped/char-code string obfuscation (detector / deny-list definition)
    "dex_encryption_signature": b'\x63\x6f\x6d\x2e\x69\x6a\x69\x61\x6d\x69',  # "com.ijiami"
    detector
  • low Obfuscation obf-hex-escape-chain scripts/root_memory_extractor_enhanced.py:80
    Escaped/char-code string obfuscation (detector / deny-list definition)
    "dex_encryption_signature": b'\x63\x6f\x6d\x2e\x62\x61\x6e\x67\x63\x6c\x65',  # "com.bangcle"
    detector
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SECURITY.md:79
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    2. **Penetration Testing**: Authorized security assessments
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SECURITY.md:80
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    3. **Malware Analysis**: Reverse engineering malicious applications
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SECURITY.md:89
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    5. **Malware Development**: Creating or enhancing malicious software
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:34
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    "tags": ["android", "apk", "unpacking", "脱壳", "加固", "frida", "dex", "reverse-engineering", "security", "pentest", "anti-debug", "memory-extraction", "root", "android-reverse", "apk-unpack", "dex-extra
    quoted
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:97
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    ✅ **Legitimate**: Security research, penetration testing, malware analysis, education

Files scanned: 24. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4731 tokens
  • 100Steps. 129 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -268 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -33 of 12 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 466: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 22 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 129 items
  • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This is a transparent Android reverse-engineering skill, but it needs review because it can control rooted devices, bypass app protections, read app memory, and has unsafe package-name handling in ADB shell commands.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026