BC kyberswap-arbitrage
Execute triangular arbitrage on Base network via KyberSwap. Use for: (1) Finding arbitrage opportunities between token pairs, (2) Calculating optimal swap paths, (3) Executing multi-hop trades, (4) Managing gas and slippage.
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 4
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 4
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenSKILL.md:14High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- **Router**: `0x61…dD8`
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenSKILL.md:15High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- **Factory**: `0x5F…35f`
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenSKILL.md:48High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- **USDC**: `0x83…913`
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenSKILL.md:49High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- **USDT**: `0xfd…8E8`
quoted
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
frontmatter-yamlSKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: Execute triangular arbitrage on Base network via KyberSwap. Use fo… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 16 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 390 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 224: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 16 items
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This DeFi arbitrage skill appears purpose-aligned, but it should be reviewed because it can direct live on-chain swaps without clear loss warnings or approval gates.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: benign · 28 May 2026