BC saucerswap-arbitrage
Execute triangular arbitrage on Hedera via SaucerSwap. Use for: (1) Finding arbitrage opportunities on HBAR DEX, (2) Multi-hop token swaps, (3) Calculating profit across pools, (4) Executing atomic swaps.
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenSKILL.md:14High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- **SaucerSwap V1**: `0xca…0dF`
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenSKILL.md:15High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- **SaucerSwap V2**: `0xA6…1B4`
quoted
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
frontmatter-yamlSKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: Execute triangular arbitrage on Hedera via SaucerSwap. Use for: (1… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 16 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 459 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 204: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 10 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 16 items
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
The skill’s DEX arbitrage purpose is coherent, but it needs review because its live mainnet swap guidance can move real funds without clear enough safety warnings or confirmation boundaries.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: benign · 28 May 2026