SKILLEMALL.ai

AC cross-border-logistics-optimizer

Compare cross-border e-commerce shipping options, packaging tactics, customs-risk signals, and speed-versus-cost tradeoffs for sellers, operations teams, and marketplace operators. Use when choosing routes, carriers, declaration practices, or packaging plans for parcel shipments without relying on live carrier APIs.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: haidong v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 720 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 63/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, failures and branches, running it twice

ProcedureLogistics and warehouseCommercetype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
63/100
Has gaps
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100

    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 35 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 720 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 317: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 12 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 35 items
    • +4Has examples (0 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    The skill's code and instructions are consistent with an advisory logistics helper that uses heuristics only, requests no credentials, and does not appear to call external services — however part of handler.py in the bundle was truncated in the listing, so confidence is reduced until the full file is inspected.
    LLM: benign (medium) · VirusTotal: benign · 13 Apr 2026