SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CB legal-contract-review-playbook

(no description)

ClawHub Agent Skills author: haidong v1.0.1 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 1 212 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process B 75/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, running it twice, progress reporting

AnalyzerInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
62/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
6
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
75/100
Nearly there
When it triggers w 12
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Add a description to the frontmatter: without it the skill never triggers.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • error name-missing SKILL.md: frontmatter has no `name`
  • error description-missing SKILL.md: no `description` — the skill can never trigger
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "type"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "language"

Process rating: all ten parameters 75/100

  • 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 38 steps
  • 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1212 tokens
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 0: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 16 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 38 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (0 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 6.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
The artifacts describe ClawHub maintainer and developer workflow skills with sensitive actions disclosed and gated by user confirmation, authentication, and audit-oriented checks.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 20 Jun 2026