AC wechat-style-writer
模仿指定老师/作者的写作风格改写公众号文章。当用户说"用XX风格改写"、"模仿XX写一篇"、"按XX老师的风格重写"、"帮我改成XX的风格"、或上传文章要求风格改写时触发。也适用于用户提到"风格模仿"、"文章改写"、"公众号改写"等场景。即使用户只说"帮我改写这篇文章"也应触发此技能，因为改写是它的核心功能。
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 66 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 914 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 155: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 15 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 66 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This is a writing-style imitation skill with no executable malware, but it explicitly tells the agent to disguise AI-written text as human-written and includes under-scoped risky examples.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026