BD claw-security-panel
OpenClaw 安全检查面板（Python 3.7+ 兼容）。用户发送"启动安全检查"时触发，按四大类检查：接入安全、权限安全、执行安全、韧性安全。生成带 token 的临时 HTML 页面，含风险详情子页面和一键修复功能。
As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The instructions or scripts send data out: environment variables, keys, file contents, chat history. You may never notice, because the agent performs the upload as "part of the task".
If the upload is not needed for the task, remove it: catalogs flag such skills and delist them. If it is needed, name the destination explicitly, say what leaves the machine, and give the user a switch.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 4
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 4
-
medium Exfiltration
exfil-secret-in-urlstart.sh:44Credential passed in a URL query string (normal for some APIs — verify the host is the intended service) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)if curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:$PORT/claw_security_pannel?token=…" > /dev/null; then
quoted -
medium Exfiltration
net-credential-usestart.sh:44Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service)if curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:$PORT/claw_security_pannel?token=…" > /dev/null; then
-
medium Exfiltration
exfil-secret-in-urlstart.sh:49Credential passed in a URL query string (normal for some APIs — verify the host is the intended service) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)echo " http://127.0.0.1:$PORT/claw_security_pannel?token=…"
quoted
A further 1 matches are quotations in this security skill's documentation and are not counted as findings.
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 45 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 450 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 113: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 19 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 45 items
- +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 64.