SKILLEMALL.ai

CC shelbys-speech

把「谢尔比的记忆」档案库(含完整记忆系统:记忆库+重要md+日志+项目档案)按主题识别,一篇篇生成博士水平、SCI 格式的技术论文(中英文双语、自动检查修复 Word、问答式修改、确认后输出 PDF)。可识别多个主题→多篇论文,每篇先询问用户。选题明确后开放完整记忆系统访问权限(只读),素材更全。作者默认<用户名> & 谢尔比,可随时按用户要求修改。用户说写论文/技术论文/博士论文/SCI/投稿/演讲/分享/总结成文时使用。关键词:论文、SCI、博士论文、投稿、英文论文、PDF、演讲、分享、提炼总结、多主题、shelbys speech、完整记忆。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: hechunxian v1.0.0 MIT-0 1 file body ≈ 754 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 7 d ago

把「谢尔比的记忆」档案库(含完整记忆系统:记忆库+重要md+日志+项目档案)按主题识别,一篇篇生成博士水平、SCI 格式的技术论文(中英文双语、自动检查修复 Word、问答式修改、确认后输出 PDF)。可识别多个主题→多篇论文,每篇先询问用户。选题明确后开放完整记忆系统访问权限(只读),素材更全。作者默认<用户名>…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureWordSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
67
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "agent_created"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 23 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 754 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 277: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 11 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 23 items

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is not plainly malicious, but it asks an agent to read and index very broad private memory, logs, rules, and project archives, then persist activity records and auto-install tooling.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 18 Sept 2026