SKILLEMALL.ai

BC lunar-calendar

中国农历/阴历的专业查询工具。 核心能力: - 公历转农历(干支纪年、生肖、闰月标志) - 农历转公历(支持闰月精准转换) - 黄历宜忌查询(嫁娶、动土、开市等) - 节气查询(24节气精准到秒级) 触发场景:当用户询问"农历"、"黄历"、"宜忌"、"阴历"、"八字基础"、"春节日期"、"闰月"或需要处理中国传统历法计算时强制激活。 输出物:结构化日期信息 + 宜忌表 + 节气标识。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: hehuibiao v0.9.0 31 files · 4 scripts body ≈ 475 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedurePersonal productivityInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 31. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 18 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 475 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -35 of 6 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 193: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 9 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill has a plausible calendar purpose, but the bundle also contains unrelated GitHub publishing, token-handling, packaging, and community-promotion workflows that go beyond a lunar calendar tool.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026