CC reddit-geo-command-center
(no description)
Reddit in 2025-2026 made TWO transformative data-licensing deals: 1.
As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, consistency, running it twice
How to improve
- Add a description to the frontmatter: without it the skill never triggers.
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- error
description-missingSKILL.md: no `description` — the skill can never trigger - warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 6216 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "sub_category" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "trigger_keywords" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "pricing"
Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100
- 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (reddit-geo-command-center) differs from the folder (geo-command-center)
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 6216 tokens
- 85Steps. 50 steps, 3 vague phrases
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 0: 120–800 characters recommended
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 14 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 50 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 26.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is mostly a disclosed marketing/reputation-monitoring playbook, but it asks users to provide ChatGPT session cookies without adequate handling safeguards.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 13 Aug 2026