AC sf-novel-writer
分阶段支持科幻（Science Fiction）小说策划、写作与润色的技能。 触发条件: "想写科幻小说"、"想创作科幻作品"、"帮我构建科幻世界观"、 "继续写科幻小说"、"设计科幻情节"、"润色科幻小说"等， 涵盖一切与科幻小说创作相关的请求。支持短篇、中篇、长篇全类型。 覆盖硬科幻、太空歌剧、反乌托邦、赛博朋克等各子类型。 也适用于对现有稿件的编辑、审阅与改进建议。
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 26 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 319 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 187: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 7 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 26 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (6 of 6)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.
External checks
ClawHub: clean
This is a disclosed science-fiction writing helper that creates local draft files, with no evidence of hidden data access, exfiltration, or destructive behavior.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026