SKILLEMALL.ai

AB parallel-code-review

Use when reviewing PRs, diffs, or completed work—covers both runtime bugs (resource leaks, edge cases, race conditions) and architecture concerns (design alignment, API contracts, consistency). Triggers when user says "review", "code review", "PR review", "审查", or after completing a feature. NOT for linter-only checks or quick syntax scans.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: HHetLI v1.0.1 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 1 528 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Use when reviewing PRs, diffs, or completed work—covers both runtime bugs (resource leaks, edge cases, race conditions) and architecture concerns (design…

As a process B 74/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice, progress reporting

AnalyzerSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
98/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
94
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
74/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 74/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 27 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1528 tokens
    • low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • -224 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 342: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 14 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 27 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 94.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a code-review helper that can send selected repository diffs to external review CLIs, but its behavior is disclosed, scoped to review work, and includes meaningful safeguards.
    LLM: benign (medium) · VirusTotal: · 9 Jul 2026