SKILLEMALL.ai

BB stellar-trails

Activates on every task: coding (features, bugs, refactoring, scripts), documents (reports, proposals, DOCX, PDF), charts and visualizations, data processing, complex multi-step planning, or even simple questions. Provides a six-phase workflow with traceability IDs, entry/exit gates, scope commitment, and three enforcement layers (phase machine, mandatory prints, preferences dialog). Complexity adapts per task tier. Use this skill whenever the user asks to build, fix, analyze, create, plan, or process anything — the framework runs internally for trivial tasks and fully for complex ones. Web development (Next.js, UI) is delegated to fullstack-dev; this framework wraps the workflow around it.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Hoshiyomi v9.18.0 MIT-0 23 files · 1 script body ≈ 14 728 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 13 h ago

Activates on every task: coding (features, bugs, refactoring, scripts), documents (reports, proposals, DOCX, PDF), charts and visualizations, data processing…

As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, execution cost

ProcedureWordSoftware developmentAI and agentsPersonal productivitytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
84/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
67
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
66/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Execution cost w 6
40
Tools and files w 18
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 5

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 5
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-background-process dev.sh:7
    Starts a background / autostarted process (code comment)
    #   - Keep: setsid (PID management), zip restore, infinite loop (user decision)
    comment
  • low Exfiltration net-credential-use SKILL.md:137
    Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (destination is a well-known publishing service)
    _OWNER_JSON=$(curl -sS -m 10 -H "Authorization: Bearer $_GH_TOKEN" https://api.github.com/user)
    known service
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-background-process SKILL.md:156
    Starts a background / autostarted process (detector / deny-list definition)
    DEV_SH="$ZSCRIPTS/dev.sh"; [ -f "$DEV_SH" ] && ! ss -tlnp | grep -q ':3000 ' && ( setsid bash "$DEV_SH" </dev/null >/dev/null 2>&1 & ) &
    detector
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-background-process SKILL.md:208
    Starts a background / autostarted process
    if [ -f "$DEV_SH" ]; then ( setsid bash "$DEV_SH" </dev/null >/dev/null 2>&1 & ) & sleep 1
  • low Exfiltration net-credential-use SKILL.md:843
    Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (destination is a well-known publishing service; quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    1. **List workflow runs**: `curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" "https://api.github.com/repos/$REPO/actions/runs?per_page=10" | python3 -c "..."`
    known servicequoted

Files scanned: 22. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 14728 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 88, 230, 478, 497): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 14728 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, git, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 85Steps. 69 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Failures and branches. 6 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 23 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (5 tags): a typed call is more reliable
  • medium 8 test cases, all positive: not one "should refuse" or "should ask first"
  • low No test case covers injection arriving through data

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
  • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
  • -217 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 699: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 50 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 69 items
  • +4Has examples (21 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This workflow skill is broadly useful in concept, but it automatically updates itself, starts a persistent local server, stores cross-session state, and touches GitHub credentials in ways that need careful review.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 13 Sept 2026