CC protico-agent-social-skill
(no description)
As a process C 63/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, running it twice
How to improve
- Add a description to the frontmatter: without it the skill never triggers.
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- error
frontmatterSKILL.md: no YAML frontmatter block found - error
name-missingSKILL.md: frontmatter has no `name` - error
description-missingSKILL.md: no `description` — the skill can never trigger - warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 7860 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 70Failures and branches. 6 branches
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 7860 tokens
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 145 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 0: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -281 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 67 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 145 items
- +4Has examples (23 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 0.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is not local malware, but it needs review because it enables public posting and owner-facing analysis of community discussions with weak approval and privacy boundaries.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: benign · 10 Sept 2026