SKILLEMALL.ai

CC browser-automation-skills

Browser automation skills for AI models — navigate, screenshot, interact, scrape, debug, test, and record browser sessions. Controls local Google Chrome via CDP with visual overlay locking. 浏览器自动化技能包,让 AI 模型控制本地 Chrome。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: huaerye23 v1.0.0 MIT-0 13 files · 1 script body ≈ 375 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Browser automation skills for AI models — navigate, screenshot, interact, scrape, debug, test, and record browser sessions.

As a process C 50/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches

ProcedurePlaywrightSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
79/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
48
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
50/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • error name-missing SKILL.md: frontmatter has no `name`
  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "display-name"

Process rating: all ten parameters 50/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 75Steps. 3 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 375 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 219: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 4 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 3 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 48.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This browser automation skill is coherent, but it gives an agent broad control over a user's existing logged-in Chrome session without enough scoping or consent guardrails.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 12 Sept 2026