BF huawei-cloud-business-support-query
Queries Huawei Cloud billing and pricing. Covers balances, bills, coupons, cash coupons, stored-value cards, orders, refunds, costs, free resources, resource usage, enterprise accounts, and on-demand/period/ELB/NAT/DCS pricing. No write operations. Use this skill when the user needs to check fees, view bills, estimate prices, review coupon balances, query orders, or get consumption stats. Triggers: 华为云计费, 账单, 余额, 优惠券, 代金券, 储值卡, 订单, 退款, 成本, 资源用量, 询价, 定价, 费用查看, 账单明细, 价格估算, 消费统计, billing, pricing, cost.
Queries Huawei Cloud billing and pricing.
As a process F 61/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/<service_category>/, scripts/as/list_scaling_groups.py, references/<service>/guide.md
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-execpolicy-bypassSKILL.md:76Runs PowerShell with execution policy bypassed (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- Windows: `skill action=exec: powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File skill://scripts/chec…ps1`
quoted -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-execpolicy-bypassSKILL.md:107Runs PowerShell with execution policy bypassed (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- Windows: `skill action=exec: powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File skill://scripts/chec…ps1`
quoted
Files scanned: 54. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/<service_category>/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/as/list_scaling_groups.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/<service>/guide.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100
- 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/<service_category>/, scripts/as/list_scaling_groups.py, references/<service>/guide.md
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 60Steps. 68 steps, 6 vague phrases
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2385 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (15 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +4No input/output examples
- -32 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 505: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 15 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 68 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.