SKILLEMALL.ai

AB huawei-cloud-cloudrobo-resource

Query CloudRobo resource quotas and resource pools — list workspace-level and Domain-level quotas with CCE/ModelArts isolation (CCE: cpu/memory/gpu, ModelArts: npu), list resource pools with multi-condition filtering (type/sub-type/pool-type/usages), and show resource pool details with node-level information (name, status, resources, labels). Provides compute capacity visibility for training, evaluation, and inference workloads. Triggers include: resource quota query, resource pool query, resource pool list, resource pool detail, quota list, Domain quota aggregation, CCE quota, ModelArts quota, 资源配额查询, 资源池查询, 资源池列表, 资源池详情, 配额查询.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: huaweicloud-skills-team v1.0.0 MIT-0 11 files · 1 script body ≈ 1 948 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

Query CloudRobo resource quotas and resource pools — list workspace-level and Domain-level quotas with CCE/ModelArts isolation (CCE: cpu/memory/gpu…

As a process B 70/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, running it twice, progress reporting

ProcedureSales and CRMtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
82
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
70/100
Nearly there
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 70/100

  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, node) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 33 steps
  • 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1948 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 636: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 20 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 33 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (7 of 7)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is mostly a coherent read-only CloudRobo resource-query helper, but its credentialed cloud workflow includes unsafe TLS guidance and an unsafe test script that users should review before installing or running.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 8 Sept 2026