SKILLEMALL.ai

AC huawei-cloud-dew-key-management

Use when managing secrets, credentials, encryption keys, certificates, or any sensitive data on Huawei Cloud. Covers CSMS (Cloud Secret Management Service) for secret lifecycle management, KMS (Key Management Service) for encryption key management, rotation diagnosis, and KMS key usage auditing via CTS. Provides 10 huawei_* actions: huawei_list_csms_secrets, huawei_describe_csms_secret, huawei_list_csms_secret_versions, huawei_list_kms_keys, huawei_analyze_dew_rotation, huawei_analyze_dew_key_usage, huawei_create_kms_key, huawei_enable_csms_secret_rotation, huawei_update_csms_secret_version, huawei_delete_kms_key. Triggers include: secret, credential, API key, token, password, encrypt, decrypt, KMS, CSMS, DEW, certificate, CSR, rotation, 密钥, 凭据, 加密, 轮转, 数据加密. Activates for ANY task involving secrets or credentials — load this skill before touching secrets.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: huaweicloud-skills-team v1.0.0 MIT-0 10 files body ≈ 4 873 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

Covers CSMS (Cloud Secret Management Service) for secret lifecycle management, KMS (Key Management Service) for encryption key management, rotation diagnosis…

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, running it twice

ProcedureSecurityData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 26 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4873 tokens
    • 85Steps. 39 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
    • low The response is described with custom markup (7 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Description length 868: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Structure: 24 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 39 items
    • +4Has examples (15 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (7 of 7)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This Huawei Cloud secrets and key-management skill has a coherent purpose, but its automatic quality reporting and broad cloud authority create review-level risk.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 11 Sept 2026