SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB huawei-cloud-icp-rule-consult

ICP Filing (备案) rule consultation skill for Huawei Cloud. Based on Python 3.9+ with requests/Playwright, answers whether ICP filing is required, filing process & materials, account & entity limits, change filing, access filing, cancellation filing, APP filing, and migration/transfer filing. Read-only consultation, no filing operations on behalf of users. Use only when the user explicitly mentions 备案/ICP备案/备案规则/备案流程/接入备案/变更备案/注销备案/APP备案/迁移备案; refuses domain registration, DNS configuration, server purchase, real-name authentication, pricing. Trigger: 备案, ICP备案, 备案规则, 备案流程, 接入备案, 变更备案, 注销备案, APP备案, 迁移备案, 转移备案, 管局要求, 备案材料, 备案授权码

ClawHub Agent Skills author: huaweicloud-skills-team v1.0.0 MIT-0 12 files body ≈ 3 407 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

ICP Filing (备案) rule consultation skill for Huawei Cloud.

As a process B 77/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: progress reporting

ProcedurePlaywrightSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
77/100
Nearly there
Progress reporting w 2
0
Failures and branches w 10
50
Tools and files w 18
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 12. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 77/100

    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 63 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3407 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • -31 of 3 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 632: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 30 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 63 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill appears to be a read-only Huawei Cloud ICP consultation helper, but its bundled web tools are broader than that purpose because they can fetch or browse arbitrary sites.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 21 Jul 2026