AB linux-distros
Linux distro playgrounds when the user needs a temporary Linux sandbox, browser-based Linux VM, disposable terminal environment, desktop Linux session, or help choosing among Ubuntu, Debian, Kali, RHEL, CentOS, Alpine, Fedora, openSUSE, or Arch Linux playgrounds. Use only for Linux distros related playground recommendations, not for programming languages, databases, frontend frameworks, or non-Linux tools.
As a process B 71/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, progress reporting
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/distros.md:24Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)Aliases: kali, security distro, pentest linux
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/distros.md:61Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- Prefer `kali-linux` for security, pentest, or offensive-security distro requests.
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:31Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- If the user asks for penetration testing or a security distro, prefer Kali Linux.
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 71/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Failures and branches. 8 branches
- 100Steps. 21 steps
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 657 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 409: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 4 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 21 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.