BC hekouwang-stock-data-reader-skill
会勇禾口王 · 个股公开数据速读 Skill。输入一个 A 股代码,自动用 akshare 拉取「资金流 / 龙虎榜 / 估值band / 财务三表 / 主营构成 / 北向 / 日K」等公开数据,算出固定指标体系 (价格轨迹·主力进出·席位结构·利润质量·利润结构·估值·风险线索),并产出「中立事后复盘」 形态的财经贴图 / 公众号长文 / 头条三件套(V2 米白或 V3 财经风)。内置金融合规护栏: 不荐股、不预测涨跌、不给买卖点,自动套风险提示条。 触发词:个股数据速读 / 扒公司公开数据 / 资金面复盘 / 出个股报告 / 3天一只 / stock-data-reader / 给我一只股的数据体检 / 用 akshare 拉某股数据。 ⚠️ 个股走公众号/头条为主;小红书仅限"中立复盘/算账/名词科普"形态且守合规护栏(不荐股/不预测/零站外导流),别发以资金流·席位为钩子的机构观感版。
会勇禾口王 · 个股公开数据速读 Skill。输入一个 A 股代码,自动用 akshare 拉取「资金流 / 龙虎榜 / 估值band / 财务三表 / 主营构成 / 北向 / 日K」等公开数据,算出固定指标体系 (价格轨迹·主力进出·席位结构·利润质量·利润结构·估值·风险线索),并产出「中立事后复盘」…
As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Broad scope
meta-broad-allowed-toolsSKILL.md:1Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bashallowed-tools: Bash Read Write Edit Glob Grep AskUserQuestion
Files scanned: 15. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "slug" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "displayName" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "summary" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage"
Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 24 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 599 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 402: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 24 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
- +3All 4 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.