SKILLEMALL.ai

AC zmm-post

📐 詹明明·公众号短文 ——公众号贴图短文技能。把验证过的内容 / 碎片做成一条公众号「短文」:标题 ≤20 中文字 + 正文 ≤1000 中文字 + 一张 banner 图。定位=轻量图文,不是 article-pipeline 那种长文深稿。标题接力 /zmm-title、首句过 /zmm-hook 口径、过国内公域全红线(公众号≠X,违禁词/大模型合规/编程词禁令重新生效)。 触发方式:/zmm-post、/公众号短文、/zmm-短文、「做个公众号短文」「公众号贴图」「这条发公众号短文」「配个 banner 的短图文」 WeChat OA short-post format: title ≤20 CN chars + body ≤1000 CN chars + one banner image. Title defers to /zmm-title, hook uses /zmm-hook standard, full domestic-platform red lines apply. Trigger: /zmm-post, "make a WeChat short post", "公众号短文" —— 📐 詹明明 · 不给公式,给判据。每条规则都标了实测代价。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 詹明明 v0.2.5 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 772 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

📐 詹明明·公众号短文 ——公众号贴图短文技能。把验证过的内容 / 碎片做成一条公众号「短文」:标题 ≤20 中文字 + 正文 ≤1000 中文字 + 一张 banner 图。定位=轻量图文,不是 article-pipeline 那种长文深稿。标题接力 /zmm-title、首句过 /zmm-hook…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

GeneratorInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
78
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 22 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 772 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 544: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 7 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 22 items

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a coherent WeChat short-post drafting skill with expected local side effects such as saving drafts, storing limited memory, and copying text to the clipboard.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 6 Sept 2026