AD jumpserver-skills
JumpServer V4.10 查询与分析 skill。Use when users ask to query assets/accounts/users/organizations/permissions, inspect access or governance, audit logins/sessions/commands/file transfers, diagnose config or organization issues, or analyze JumpServer usage data for a specific day or time range such as 使用报告、日报、某天使用情况、某天登录/会话/命令/传输情况、usage report, daily usage report, usage analysis, or JumpServer usage overview.
As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvREADME.en.md:35Reads a .env file (documentation of a security skill)cp .env.example .env
security skill -
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvREADME.md:35Reads a .env file (documentation of a security skill)cp .env.example .env
security skill
Files scanned: 33. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (jumpserver-skills) differs from the folder (jumpserver)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 60 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1150 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 407: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 8 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 60 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 12)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.