SKILLEMALL.ai

AC free-model-auditor

审计 WorkBuddy 自定义模型注册表(models.json)中的免费模型:跨多个 OpenAI 兼容厂商新增可发现的免费模型、 剔除已转付费或失效的模型,保持注册表真实有效。当用户要求「审计自定义模型」「检查有没有新的免费模型」 「测试其余平台有无遗漏」「定期巡检模型清单」或希望对免费 API 模型做健康检查时使用。 本技能对海外平台执行 VPN 连通性门禁,按各厂商策略判定免费,活体实测每个候选,并自动把新增/移除差异应用到 models.json。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: iGenomed v1.6.0 MIT-0 8 files body ≈ 1 900 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

审计 WorkBuddy 自定义模型注册表(models.json)中的免费模型:跨多个 OpenAI 兼容厂商新增可发现的免费模型、 剔除已转付费或失效的模型,保持注册表真实有效。当用户要求「审计自定义模型」「检查有没有新的免费模型」 「测试其余平台有无遗漏」「定期巡检模型清单」或希望对免费 API…

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
76
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "agent_created"

Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 47 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1900 tokens
  • low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 232: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 14 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 47 items
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill does what it says, but it automatically uses stored API keys for live provider calls and modifies the user's model registry without a clear user confirmation step.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 30 Aug 2026