SKILLEMALL.ai

BD quick-api

Test any API endpoint in seconds. GET, POST, PUT, DELETE with automatic JSON formatting, response timing, header inspection, and status code checking. The fastest way to debug APIs from your agent.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: FLY v1.0.0 1 file body ≈ 382 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 38/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers

IntegrationSoftware developmentAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
38/100
Unfinished process
Steps w 15
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 2

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 2
  • low Exfiltration net-credential-use SKILL.md:36
    Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (security demo / example)
    curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" "https://api.example.com/protected"
    demo
  • low Exfiltration net-credential-use SKILL.md:39
    Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (security demo / example)
    curl -s -H "X-API-Key: $KEY" "https://api.example.com/data"
    demo

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 38/100

  • 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 382 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 197: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 8 headings
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a small API-testing helper with credential-bearing examples that require care, but the artifacts do not show automatic execution or malicious behavior.
LLM: benign (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026