SKILLEMALL.ai

BB gaslighting-detector

Gaslighting Detector is an AI pattern checker for messages and conversations that leave you doubting your memory, judgment, or emotional reality. It spots gaslighting, manipulation, blame shifting, narcissist and narcissistic abuse patterns, emotional abuse, toxic partner tactics, and coercive control, then helps you document evidence, set boundaries, and respond safely. 煤气灯操控识别、narcissist 识别、narcissistic abuse、情感操纵、毒性关系预警。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: wes v1.0.2 MIT-0 4 files · 1 script body ≈ 1 079 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 67/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting

AnalyzerInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
67/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 67/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 43 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1079 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • -212 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 427: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 16 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 43 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is mostly a text-only relationship-pattern checker, but its included publish script can push code and publish this package under a mismatched ReplyHer slug.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026