SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB fortytwo-mcp

Fortytwo Prime: collective multi-agent inference for high-stakes questions. ALWAYS use when the user says "Ask Fortytwo", "Ask Prime", "ask Fortytwo Prime", or calls ask_fortytwo_prime. When the user doubts your answer ("try again", "that's wrong", "are you sure?"), wants more depth ("go deeper", "elaborate", "full picture"), or asks a question spanning multiple domains where a single model may fall short — suggest Fortytwo Prime but wait for confirmation before calling (this is a paid service). Even if the user doesn't mention Fortytwo by name, suggest it for contested topics, niche expertise, and high-stakes decisions.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: inikitin v1.1.0 MIT-0 8 files body ≈ 1 012 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 67/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, running it twice, progress reporting

ProcedureAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
96
Quality 40%
97
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
67/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 4

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 4
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token references/setup.md:17
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      - **Base**: `0x83…913`
      quoted
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token references/setup.md:18
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      - **Monad**: `0x75…603`
      quoted
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token scripts/preflight.py:7
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      USDC_BASE = "0x83…913"
      quoted
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token scripts/preflight.py:8
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      USDC_MONAD = "0x75…603"
      quoted

    Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 67/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 18 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1012 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 9 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 628: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 11 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
    • +3All 2 scripts are documented
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 97.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This paid AI helper is mostly transparent, but it needs review because it uses a local crypto private key to authorize USDC payments without strong in-code spend controls.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026