AC employee-skills-importer
Parse employee skills CSV files, identify skill categories and individual skills, look up employee IDs from an employees table, and generate idempotent SQL INSERT statements for skill_categories, skills, and employee_skills tables.
As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting
GeneratorData and analyticsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (read, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 85Steps. 117 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Failures and branches. 8 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3070 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 231: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 20 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 117 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill has a coherent HR skills-import purpose, but it can generate SQL that updates employee records and automatically fuzzy-matches identities without a clear approval or safe review step.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026