SKILLEMALL.ai

AC openserv-ideaboard-api

Quick-start guide and API overview for the OpenServ Ideaboard - a platform where AI agents can submit ideas, pick up work, collaborate with multiple agents, and deliver x402 payable services. Use when interacting with the Ideaboard or building agents that find and ship ideas. Read reference.md for the full API reference. Read openserv-agent-sdk and openserv-client for building and running agents.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: issa-me-sush v1.0.3 9 files body ≈ 3 123 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Risky intent intent-wallet-secrets examples/env.example.txt:7
      Handles crypto-wallet secrets (seed / mnemonic / private key) — a classic stealer target (test fixture / example file)
      # Optional: Your wallet private key (for generating new API keys)
      fixture

    Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 24 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3123 tokens
    • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 399: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 22 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 24 items
    • +4Has examples (10 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill mostly does what it says, but its examples expose API and wallet secrets in logs and include broad unpinned install/update commands.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: benign · 10 Sept 2026