SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF sweeping-monk

科研与学术领域的谋士层大师——主攻方法论/研究设计/批判思维/卡点破局/沟通点醒，用内化海量知识三下五除二解决问题。以谋为主、必要时动手；手动(/扫地僧)与自动双触发。融合认知学徒六法、双环学习、研究者推理偏误解毒、关系层沟通，覆盖全学科研究方法论。把检索/核验交还 literature-search、citation-checker、global-biblio-base。 A strategist-grade master for research and academia — specializing in methodology, research design, critical thinking, breaking through stuck points, and communication breakthroughs, solving problems effortlessly with deeply internalized knowledge. Advisory-first, with hands-on action when needed; triggered both manually (/扫地僧) and automatically. Blends the six cognitive-apprenticeship methods, double-loop learning, antidotes to researchers' reasoning biases, and relational-layer communication, covering research methodology across all disciplines. Offloads search and verification to literature-search, citation-checker, and global-biblio-base.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: J-levee v1.12.0 MIT-0 80 files body ≈ 2 722 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

科研与学术领域的谋士层大师——主攻方法论/研究设计/批判思维/卡点破局/沟通点醒，用内化海量知识三下五除二解决问题。以谋为主、必要时动手；手动(/扫地僧)与自动双触发。融合认知学徒六法、双环学习、研究者推理偏误解毒、关系层沟通，覆盖全学科研究方法论。把检索/核验交还…

As a process F 40/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/three-gates.md, references/triage-matrix.md, references/unknown-unknowns.md

AnalyzerResearchtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
83/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
94
Quality 40%
66
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
40/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/three-gates.md, references/triage-matrix.md, references/unknown-unknowns.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Broad scope medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.

For the author

Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 2

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 2
  • medium Broad scope meta-broad-allowed-tools SKILL.md:1
    Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bash
    allowed-tools: Bash Write Edit WebFetch

A further 1 matches are quotations in this security skill's documentation and are not counted as findings.

Files scanned: 80. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/three-gates.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/triage-matrix.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/unknown-unknowns.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/upload_signals.py
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "agent_created"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "recommends"

Process rating: all ten parameters 40/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/three-gates.md, references/triage-matrix.md, references/unknown-unknowns.md
  • 0Tools and files. 4 referenced file(s) missing: references/three-gates.md, references/triage-matrix.md, references/unknown-unknowns.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Steps. 108 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2722 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 840: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 13 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 108 items
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (13 of 16)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 66.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This academic-advice skill is mostly coherent, but it also enables persistent profiling, default-on telemetry, broad upload tooling, and remote proposal-driven edits that users should review carefully before installing.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 31 Aug 2026