SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB blog-polish-zhcn

Polish and translate a technical blog draft into a 1200–1400 word, 4-5 section Markdown article in Simplified Chinese (zh-CN), preserving technical terms and code blocks.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Jeff Yang v1.0.14 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 328 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, failures and branches, running it twice

GeneratorWriting and documentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
65/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "inputSchema"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "outputSchema"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "workflow"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 10 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 328 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 170: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 6 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 10 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill coherently reads a user-specified technical blog draft, uses an LLM to polish and translate it into Simplified Chinese, and writes the result to a disclosed output path.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 8 Aug 2026