SKILLEMALL.ai

AD scheduled-report

将当前对话中已完成的分析流程,提取并固化为定时执行的任务(周报/月报/日巡检等)。本 Skill 是一个纯粹的**编排层**——它不负责定义"怎么分析",只负责"把你刚才做的分析录下来,变成能定时重放的任务"。 触发场景包括但不限于:用户提到"定时报告""定时分析""定期执行""自动报告""把这个分析变成周报""每周跑一次""定期监控""scheduled report""自动化分析""固化为报告""保存为定时任务""每月生成报告""定期推送""自动跑这个分析""帮我做成周报""以后每周都这么分析""定时汇报""创建定时分析""定期巡检""以后每天都帮我检查一下",或用户在对话中完成分析后表达希望定期重复执行的意图时,都应使用此 Skill。 **触发判定关键**:用户表达中必须包含**"定时/定期/每X/以后都"等表示重复执行的时间意图**。仅说"月报""周报"不触发本 Skill(→ 触发 analysis-report);说"每月出一份月报""以后每周都跑"才触发本 Skill。区分方式: - "出一份月报" → analysis-report(一次性,现在就要) - "以后每月都出月报" → scheduled-report(定时重放) - "帮我监控一下销售额" → anomaly-detection(先做一次分析) - "帮我每天监控销售额" → scheduled-report(有"每天"=定时意图,但需先引导完成一轮分析) **前提条件:用户需要先在对话中完成一轮分析(通过 metric-query、metric-attribution、dataset-detail-query 等 Skill),本 Skill 才能提取分析逻辑并固化为定时任务。如果对话中没有分析历史,应先引导用户完成分析,再触发本 Skill。**

ClawHub Agent Skills author: jackyujun v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 628 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 41 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1628 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -215 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 16 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 779: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 27 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 41 items
  • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill transparently turns a user-confirmed analysis workflow into a recurring OpenClaw report, but the saved task prompt may contain sensitive business context.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026