AB dev-workflow
Structured development workflow inspired by Garry Tan's gstack. Use when the user wants to build a feature, start a project, do a code review, or ship code with a disciplined Think → Plan → Build → Review → Test → Ship process. Triggers on phrases like "start a project", "build a feature", "dev workflow", "ship code", "code review workflow", "plan and build", "structured development". Also useful when the user wants to run a disciplined development process with role-based subagents for analysis, design, review, QA, and release.
As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, consistency, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (dev-workflow) differs from the folder (gstack-workflow)
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 46 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1313 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 7 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 533: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 16 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 46 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 96.