SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC Prove Before Act

Prove Before Act accountability integration for AI agents. REST API, MCP, and x402. The @jasonxkensei/xproof ClawHub slug is a legacy compatibility identifier.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Prove Before Act v4.0.18 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 4 746 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
70
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
52/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning name-format name should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)
  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"

Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (Prove Before Act) differs from the folder (xproof)
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4746 tokens
  • 100Steps. 12 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 15 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 159: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 22 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 12 items
  • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 4)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 70.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This documentation-only skill describes a coherent proof-auditing integration that sends local hashes and selected metadata to an external certification service, with the main privacy and payment risks disclosed.
LLM: benign (high) · 20 Aug 2026