AF ppt-produce-bycodex
Create and iterate enterprise application software solution PPTs as full-page PNG slides and optional PPTX decks. Use when the user wants to start, design, generate, redraw, repair, batch-produce, or package a business/consulting/enterprise software solution presentation, especially with imagegen/gpt-image-2, PPT PNG pages, contact sheets, PPTX assembly, or 413/too-large fallback handling.
Create and iterate enterprise application software solution PPTs as full-page PNG slides and optional PPTX decks.
As a process F 52/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: assets/titlebar-template/enterprise-solution-titlebar-4k.png
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Exfiltration
net-credential-usereferences/ppt-production-guide.md:116Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)zsh -lc 'source ~/.zshrc >/dev/null 2>&1 || true; printf "OPENAI_BASE_URL=%s\n" "${OPENAI_BASE_URL:-}"; if [ -n "${OPENAI_API_KEY:-}" ]; then echo "OPENAI_API_KEY=present"; else echo "OPENAI_API_KEY=mquoted
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/titlebar-template/enterprise-solution-titlebar-4k.png
Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: assets/titlebar-template/enterprise-solution-titlebar-4k.png
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Steps. 60 steps
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2322 tokens
- low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 392: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 60 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 3)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.