AC sysadmin-toolbox
Tool discovery and shell one-liner reference for sysadmin, DevOps, and security tasks. AUTO-CONSULT this skill when the user is: troubleshooting network issues, debugging processes, analyzing logs, working with SSL/TLS, managing DNS, testing HTTP endpoints, auditing security, working with containers, writing shell scripts, or asks 'what tool should I use for X'. Source: github.com/trimstray/the-book-of-secret-knowledge
As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 11
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 11
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/cli-tools.md:182Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) <a href="https://github.com/rebootuser/LinEnum"><b>LinEnum</b></a> - scripted Local Linux Enumeration & Privilege Escalation Checks.<br>
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/cli-tools.md:185Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) <a href="https://github.com/carlospolop/privilege-escalation-awesome-scripts-suite"><b>PEASS</b></a> - privilege escalation tools for Windows and Linux/Unix and MacOS.<br>
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/security-tools.md:1Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)#### Hacking/Penetration Testing [<sup>[TOC]</sup>](#anger-table-of-contents)
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/security-tools.md:7Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) <a href="https://www.metasploit.com/"><b>Metasploit</b></a> - tool and framework for pentesting system, web and many more.<br>
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/security-tools.md:16Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) <a href="https://www.faradaysec.com/"><b>Faraday</b></a> - an Integrated Multiuser Pentest Environment.<br>
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/security-tools.md:19Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) <a href="https://github.com/1N3/Sn1per"><b>Sn1per</b></a> - automated pentest framework for offensive security experts.<br>
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/security-tools.md:26Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) <a href="https://github.com/evyatarmeged/Raccoon"><b>Raccoon</b></a> - is a high performance offensive security tool for reconnaissance and vulnerability scanning.<br>
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-background-processreferences/shell-oneliners.md:71Starts a background / autostarted process (documentation of a security skill)disown -a && exit
security skill -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/web-tools.md:63Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) <a href="https://findsubdomains.com/"><b>Find subdomains online</b></a> - find subdomains for security assessment penetration test.<br>
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:19Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- Doing security audits or pentesting
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:29Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)| `references/security-tools.md` | Pentesting, vulnerability scanning, exploit databases, CTF resources |
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 30 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 658 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 422: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 30 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.