CD workboard
当用户想用 OpenClaw Workboard 看板管理智能体工作卡片时使用——列出/创建/查看卡片、把就绪卡片分派给子智能体 worker、查看卡片生命周期与诊断、或排查卡片无法保存、分派仅数据、worker 不启动等问题。涉及 openclaw workboard CLI、/workboard 斜杠命令、看板状态机与会话生命周期同步。
当用户想用 OpenClaw Workboard 看板管理智能体工作卡片时使用——列出/创建/查看卡片、把就绪卡片分派给子智能体 worker、查看卡片生命周期与诊断、或排查卡片无法保存、分派仅数据、worker 不启动等问题。涉及 openclaw workboard CLI、/workboard…
As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 9 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (workboard) differs from the folder (workboard-skill)
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 47 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2501 tokens
- low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (5 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 171: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 21 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 47 items
- +4Has examples (12 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.