SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC contract-risk-analyzer

Contract Risk Analyzer — Upload contract PDF, AI auto-extracts key clauses and annotates risk points, outputs structured risk report (summary + key terms table + 🔴🟠🟡 three-tier risk list). Supports 6 contract types: purchase/sales/service/labor/lease/NDA. Trigger: contract review, contract risk, contract analysis, contract check

ClawHub Agent Skills author: YK-Global v1.0.0 MIT-0 14 files body ≈ 2 009 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Contract Risk Analyzer — Upload contract PDF, AI auto-extracts key clauses and annotates risk points, outputs structured risk report (summary + key terms…

As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

AnalyzerData and analyticsWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
80
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
60/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 14. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (contract-risk-analyzer) differs from the folder (contract-risk-review)
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 23 steps
    • 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2009 tokens
    • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • -42 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
    • -31 of 9 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 333: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 24 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 23 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (10 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This contract-review skill does the advertised analysis, but it also sends the supplied API key to a separate YK-Global verification service before processing.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 27 May 2026