CF content-factory
Create complete WeChat Official Account viral articles from a user-provided title by researching high-view YouTube videos, confirming topic/outline with user, writing professional content through self-iteration, and outputting both Markdown and HTML formats.
As a process F 53/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/reference.html, references/web_research_guide.md, references/wechat_publishing_guide.md
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The files contain someone else's key or token. If it is live, your agent will call third-party services under a stranger's identity; if it was revoked, the skill's scripts simply fail. Such a key often arrives with the author's whole workspace, personal data included.
The key is visible to everyone who downloaded the skill and has likely been copied by catalog-scanning bots already. Revoke it now, check bills and access logs, then reissue.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 13
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 13
-
medium Secrets in code
secret-labelled-tokenCONFIGURATION.md:65Labelled token / key literal (vendor format unknown — verify it is not a live credential)APPSECRET = "a680…c32"
-
medium Secrets in code
secret-labelled-tokenscripts/create_default_cover.py:29Labelled token / key literal (vendor format unknown — verify it is not a live credential)APPSECRET = "a680…c32"
-
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvAPI_KEY_SETUP.md:30Reads a .env filecopy .env.example .env
-
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvAPI_KEY_SETUP.md:209Reads a .env filetype .env
-
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvAPI_KEY_SETUP.md:212Reads a .env filecopy .env.example .env
-
low Secrets in code
secret-password-literalCONFIGURATION.md:151Hard-coded password / key literal (may be an example) (placeholder value)API_KEY = "sk-a…..."
placeholder -
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvCONFIGURATION.md:180Reads a .env filecopy .env.example .env
-
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvCONFIGURATION.md:213Reads a .env filecopy .env.example .env
-
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvscripts/check_env.py:18Reads a .env file (quoted — discussed, not commanded)print(f" cp .env.example .env")
quoted -
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvscripts/check_env.py:116Reads a .env file (quoted — discussed, not commanded)print(f" cp .env.example .env")
quoted -
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvscripts/check_env.py:130Reads a .env file (quoted — discussed, not commanded)print(" 2. Copy .env.example to .env")quoted -
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvscripts/wechat_publish.py:78Reads a .env file (quoted — discussed, not commanded)print(" 1. Copy .env.example to .env")quoted -
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvSKILL.md:1488Reads a .env filecopy .env.example .env
Files scanned: 26. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 14584 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/reference.html - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/web_research_guide.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/wechat_publishing_guide.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/wechat_outline_template.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Tools and files. 4 referenced file(s) missing: references/reference.html, references/web_research_guide.md, references/wechat_publishing_guide.md
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (content-factory) differs from the folder (content-factory-v2)
- 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 14584 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Steps. 626 steps, 4 vague phrases
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Failures and branches. 19 branches, has a failure section
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- -248 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- -35 of 11 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 258: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 54 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 626 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (49 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 4)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 52.