SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD xiaohongshu-post

小红书图文创作 Skill。根据主题、受众、核心观点进行网络搜索创作， 生成吸睛标题（≤20字）+ 小红书风格文案（≤1000字，含emoji和hashtag） + 3:4竖版封面图（文字突出+简约矢量背景）。 触发词：发小红书、生成小红书图文、小红书创作、发布小红书。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: jeffli2002 v1.0.0 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 879 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ReferenceInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
71
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-privilege scripts/generate_post.py:67
    Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (detector / deny-list definition; string literal in code, not executed)
    args: ['--no-sandbox', '--disable-setuid-sandbox']
    detectorcode literal

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (xiaohongshu-post) differs from the folder (jeff-xiaohongshu-post)
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 27 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 879 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
  • -212 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 135: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 16 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 27 items
  • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
  • +3All 2 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This content-generation skill is mostly purpose-aligned, but its recommended image workflow exposes a local callback service through a public tunnel using helper scripts that are not included for review.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026