AD revenuecat
RevenueCat metrics, customer data, and documentation search. Use when querying subscription analytics, MRR, churn, customers, or RevenueCat docs.
As a process D 36/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers
ProcedureData and analyticsWriting and documentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 19. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 36/100
- 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 886 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3No numbered steps or checklist
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 145: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 6 headings
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (14 of 16)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is mostly transparent, but it mixes a read-oriented RevenueCat assistant with documentation for sensitive admin actions like refunds, cancellations, deletes, and webhook changes.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 10 Sept 2026