BC daily-english-card
每日英语口语学习卡片推送。每天早上8:30自动生成英语场景对话卡片图片并推送到微信。 支持440个日常场景、11种卡片风格、遗忘曲线复习,自动上传到IMA知识库存档。 触发词:英语卡片、英语学习、英语口语、口语练习、每日英语、英语推送、English card、口语、学英语、背单词
As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, running it twice
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 6
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 6
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenREADME.md:274High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)- target: o9…@….wechat
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenREADME.md:295High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition; documentation table row)| target | `o9…@….wechat` |
detectortable -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenREADME.md:317High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"target": "o9…@….wechat",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenREADME.md:405High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)--delivery '{"mode":"announce","channel":"openclaw-weixin","to":"o9…@….wechat","accountId":"e7ae…bot"}'quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenSKILL.md:57High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)- **target**: `o9…@….wechat`
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenSKILL.md:144High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)"to": "o9…@….wechat",
quoted
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 20 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 905 tokens
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 141: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 17 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 20 items
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
The skill has a coherent English-learning purpose, but it automates recurring WeChat delivery and IMA archival through fixed account details and local credential helpers without enough user-specific scoping or controls.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026