AC codewiki
Trigger a one-shot workflow that clones (or pulls) a Git repository, generates a structured wiki from it using the `codewiki` CLI, and optionally renders the result into static MkDocs / VitePress sites with an HTTP preview. Use this skill whenever the user asks to "generate a wiki", "document this repo", "create a code wiki", or invokes `/codewiki <input>`.
Trigger a one-shot workflow that clones (or pulls) a Git repository, generates a structured wiki from it using the codewiki CLI, and optionally renders the…
As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "dependencies"
Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python, node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 18 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1650 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low The response is described with custom markup (9 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 2 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 359: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 10 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.